Can You Actually Change Your Personality? (Copy)

Part 2 of 3: What the science, and one client’s story, tell us about neuroticism and the possibility of change

In the first article in this series, we looked at what neuroticism actually is: not a character flaw, but a style of stress processing shaped by genetics, lived experience, and the accumulated emotional histories of the families we come from. We ended with a question that most people who recognize themselves in that description immediately ask: can it change?

The answer, increasingly supported by decades of research, is yes. But the how matters. And so does understanding what “change” actually means at the level of the brain, the nervous system, and the body.

What the Personality Theories Say

The Scar Hypothesis

The scar hypothesis proposes that significant psychological adversity, particularly depression and trauma, leaves lasting marks on personality structure (Rohde et al., 1990; Kendler et al., 2004). Under this model, recurrent emotional suffering elevates and entrenches neuroticism over time: each episode of depression, each relational rupture, each period of prolonged stress reshapes the personality toward greater negative affectivity. Neuroticism, in this framing, is partly a wound — an accumulation of what the nervous system has had to adapt to.

The Continuity and Vulnerability Hypotheses

A competing but not incompatible view holds that neuroticism precedes and predicts adversity rather than resulting from it. The continuity hypothesis argues that high neuroticism generates the very conditions, interpersonal conflict, occupational instability, reduced help-seeking, that make adverse outcomes more likely (Clark et al., 1994). The vulnerability hypothesis goes further: high neuroticism amplifies the impact of stressors, making the same objective event more psychologically costly for high-N individuals (Kendler et al., 2004).

These models are not in opposition. They describe a bidirectional loop: neuroticism elevates vulnerability to stressors, stressors further elevate neuroticism, and without deliberate interruption, the cycle compounds, across a lifetime, and across generations.

The Evidence for Malleability

The more hopeful and more recent body of work is unequivocal: personality, including neuroticism, can change. Roberts and colleagues’ (2017) landmark meta-analysis of 207 longitudinal studies found that personality traits show meaningful change across the lifespan, not merely as a statistical artifact, but in ways that correspond to real differences in behavior, relationships, and wellbeing.

Critically, psychotherapy is one of the most robust predictors of personality change. Psychological treatment, across modalities, produces changes in neuroticism comparable in magnitude to decades of natural maturation (Bleidorn et al., 2019; Roberts et al., 2017). Change is not only possible; it is accelerated by precisely the conditions we create in clinical work: safety, reflection, relational repair, and the gradual re-calibration of the threat-detection system.

What Actually Changes in the Brain and Body

When neuroticism decreases, what is changing is not merely a self-report score. The changes are neurological, physiological, and relational.

Amygdala reactivity. High neuroticism is associated with heightened amygdala response to negative emotional stimuli and slower habituation (Canli et al., 2001). Effective psychological intervention, particularly mindfulness-based approaches, reduces amygdala reactivity and strengthens prefrontal regulatory circuits, producing a nervous system that can pause before reacting (Hölzel et al., 2011).

Heart rate variability (HRV). Higher neuroticism is consistently associated with reduced vagal tone and lower HRV, an index of the nervous system’s capacity for flexible response (Thayer et al., 2012). HRV is not just a cardiac metric; it measures the degree to which the social engagement system is available. People with lower HRV are, quite literally, less capable of the physiological down-regulation that intimacy requires. Mindfulness practice and self-compassion training have both been associated with improvements in vagal tone (Kok et al., 2013).

The default mode network. Neuroticism is associated with heightened default mode network (DMN) activity, the ruminative, self-referential neural loop that produces worry, self-criticism, and mental time-travel (Davey et al., 2016). Both mindfulness practice and self-compassion training quiet the DMN and shift the individual toward a more grounded, present-centered awareness.

A Portrait in Practice

The following is a composite clinical portrait, constructed from themes common across many clients. All identifying details have been altered.

Maya is 41, a physician, and one of the most competent people in any room she enters. She came to therapy because her second marriage was, as she put it, “bleeding out quietly.” Her husband, a gentle and conflict-averse man, had begun sleeping in the guest room, not dramatically, but as a slow retreat from what he described, in their one couples session, as “never being able to get it right.”

In our early sessions, Maya described her interior life with clinical precision: a near-constant state of anticipatory dread; the sensation, when her husband fell quiet, that she had done something wrong and needed to investigate; a pattern of lying awake cataloguing the minor failures of her day; and a deep, unspoken belief that she was, at her core, too much to be truly loved without enormous effort on her part.

She had grown up in a home shaped by her mother’s undiagnosed anxiety and her father’s chronic emotional unavailability, not abusive, not dramatic, but a household in which emotional need was quietly burdensome and competence was the only currency of worth. Her maternal grandmother had survived partition in South Asia; her mother had grown up in a family that had lost everything twice before she was born. The hypervigilance Maya carried had a very long lineage.

What struck me clinically was how little neuroticism looked, from the outside, like what most people imagine. Maya was not falling apart. She was high-functioning, deeply accomplished, and capable of enormous warmth. What she could not do, what her nervous system made nearly impossible, was rest inside a relationship. She could not receive reassurance without immediately doubting it. She could not experience her husband’s quiet contentment as anything other than suspicious distance. She could not, in Bowen’s terms, remain herself in the presence of relational anxiety, she fused, she over-interpreted, she managed.

Beneath the marriage problem was a nervous system that had learned, very early, that safety was provisional. And that lesson had outlived the circumstances that taught it.

Eighteen months later, after sustained work in individual therapy oriented around self-compassion and earned secure attachment, MSC group practice, and a return to couples work, Maya said something I have thought about many times since: “I used to think something was wrong with me. Now I think something happened to me. That sounds like a small difference, but it isn’t.”

It is not. It is, in fact, the beginning of everything.

What the Evidence Says Actually Works

Psychotherapy

Across orientations, cognitive-behavioral, psychodynamic, interpersonal, and integrative, psychotherapy produces reliable decreases in neuroticism (Quilty et al., 2008; Tang et al., 2009). These changes appear to be above and beyond symptom reduction: people are not just feeling less depressed; they are becoming, at the trait level, less reactive, less threatened, and more flexible. The relational dimension of therapy, the experience of being genuinely seen, held, and not abandoned during difficult emotional states, may be as therapeutically active as any specific technique (Norcross & Wampold, 2011).

Mindfulness-Based Interventions

Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) have both demonstrated reductions in neuroticism in clinical and non-clinical populations (Hanley et al., 2015; Keng et al., 2011). The mechanism is not relaxation per se, but the cultivation of a particular quality of attention: the ability to observe one’s internal states without immediately being consumed by them. When a person can notice the first pulse of irritability or dread without fusing with it, they gain a crucial regulatory interval, a pause between stimulus and response, in which they can choose rather than react.

Mindful Self-Compassion

Perhaps the most directly relevant intervention for neuroticism is Mindful Self-Compassion (MSC), developed by Christopher Germer and Kristin Neff, with whom I have had the privilege of training directly. The MSC program targets the very mechanisms that perpetuate neuroticism: harsh self-criticism, emotional isolation, over-identification with painful states, and the belief that one must earn safety through performance or vigilance.

Self-compassion interventions produce decreases in neuroticism, rumination, and self-criticism, alongside increases in emotional regulation, resilience, and the capacity for genuine intimacy (Neff & Germer, 2013; Muris et al., 2016). The core reorientation, from self-judgment to self-witness; from isolation to common humanity; from reactivity to mindful presence, directly addresses the nervous system’s threat-calibration. When we stop treating our own inner states as emergencies to be suppressed or catastrophized, the entire threat system gradually de-escalates.

Exercise and Behavioral Activation

Physical exercise, particularly aerobic exercise practiced consistently, produces modest but reliable reductions in neuroticism (Stephan et al., 2014). Exercise reduces basal cortisol, increases BDNF (a neuroplasticity marker), and improves HRV. It may also function indirectly through mastery experiences that build the internal locus of control that high-N individuals often lack.

Attachment-Informed Relational Work

Because neuroticism is in significant part a relational phenomenon, forged in early attachment relationships and perpetuated through insecure relational patterns, healing it often requires relational experience as its medicine. Research on earned secure attachment demonstrates that adults who grew up in insecure relational environments can develop the neural and psychological architecture of security through sustained experience of safe, attuned relationships, therapeutic, romantic, or friendship-based (Roisman et al., 2002; Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007). Security is not only something we receive in childhood; it is something we can build, deliberately, in adulthood.

The brain remains plastic. The nervous system retains its capacity to learn safety. What was inherited as reactive vigilance can, with the right conditions, be gradually transformed into something more like what we were always trying to reach.

Part 2 of 3. Part 3: Neuroticism and Your Relationships: Parenting, Desire, and the Ache of Loneliness.

References

Bleidorn, W., Hopwood, C. J., Back, M. D., Denissen, J. J. A., Hennecke, M., Orghian, D., … & Zimmermann, J. (2019). Personality change: A socioanalytic perspective. Journal of Personality, 87(1), 69–82.

Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. Jason Aronson.

Canli, T., Zhao, Z., Desmond, J. E., Kang, E., Gross, J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2001). An fMRI study of personality influences on brain reactivity to emotional stimuli. Behavioral Neuroscience, 115(1), 33–42.

Clark, L. A., Watson, D., & Mineka, S. (1994). Temperament, personality, and the mood and anxiety disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(1), 103–116.

Davey, C. G., Pujol, J., & Harrison, B. J. (2016). Mapping the self in the brain’s default mode network. NeuroImage, 132, 390–397.

Hanley, A. W., Warner, A. R., Dehili, V. M., Canto, A. I., & Garland, E. L. (2015). Washing dishes to wash the dishes: Brief instruction in an informal mindfulness practice. Mindfulness, 6(5), 1095–1103.

Hölzel, B. K., Carmody, J., Vangel, M., Congleton, C., Yerramsetti, S. M., Gard, T., & Lazar, S. W. (2011). Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain gray matter density. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 191(1), 36–43.

Kendler, K. S., Kuhn, J., & Prescott, C. A. (2004). The interrelationship of neuroticism, sex, and stressful life events in the prediction of episodes of major depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161(4), 631–636.

Keng, S. L., Smoski, M. J., & Robins, C. J. (2011). Effects of mindfulness on psychological health: A review of empirical studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(6), 1041–1056.

Kok, B. E., Coffey, K. A., Cohn, M. A., Catalino, L. I., Vacharkulksemsuk, T., Algoe, S. B., … & Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). How positive emotions build physical health. Psychological Science, 24(7), 1123–1132.

Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford Press.

Muris, P., Meesters, C., Pierik, A., & de Kock, B. (2016). Good for the self: Self-compassion and other self-regulatory emotion regulation strategies in relation to emotional problems in adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(2), 607–617.

Neff, K. D., & Germer, C. K. (2013). A pilot study and randomized controlled trial of the Mindful Self-Compassion program. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(1), 28–44.

Norcross, J. C., & Wampold, B. E. (2011). What works for whom: Tailoring psychotherapy to the person. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(2), 127–132.

Quilty, L. C., Meusel, L. A. C., & Bagby, R. M. (2008). Neuroticism as a mediator of treatment response to SSRIs in major depressive disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 111(1), 67–73.

Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 117–141.

Rohde, P., Lewinsohn, P. M., & Seeley, J. R. (1990). Are people changed by the experience of having an episode of depression? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99(3), 264–271.

Roisman, G. I., Padrón, E., Sroufe, L. A., & Egeland, B. (2002). Earned-secure attachment status in retrospect and prospect. Child Development, 73(4), 1204–1219.

Stephan, Y., Sutin, A. R., & Terracciano, A. (2014). Physical activity and personality development across adulthood and old age. Journal of Research in Personality, 49, 1–7.

Tang, T. Z., DeRubeis, R. J., Hollon, S. D., Amsterdam, J., Shelton, R., & Schalet, B. (2009). Personality change during depression treatment. Archives of General Psychiatry, 66(12), 1322–1330.

Thayer, J. F., Åhs, F., Fredrikson, M., Sollers, J. J., & Wager, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of heart rate variability and neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(2), 747–756.